User blog comment:DanzxvFan8275/Proposal 11: Allow Administrators to Promote Rollbacks (The REAL Deal, Not That Centrist Bullshit from February)/@comment-26182781-20170828082137/@comment-33046846-20170828120643

I'm not sure that all of us would need to agree. We have 4 administrators, and if 3 are fine while 1 isn't, then it should be fine to rpomote the user, as that is a majority. But the reason I don't like that idea is that rollback is a right that can not really be abused or harmful. Rollback rights will always go into the hands of trusted users, and users that have proven themselves to be at least somewhat deficated to helping out. Also, I'm not sure why you're against this one when I proposed that rollbacks cma be promoted by the discretion od administrators in a proposal I just linked. So I'm wondering - why did you have concerns about it here instead of there? By the way, let's say rollback rights eventually go into the wrong hands. We can easily just demote the user. Chances are, rollback rights aren't harmful, but then again, it could happen. I'm probably going to add a rule about demoting rollbacks would need a majority vote by administrators.

Because of this, I highly consider you chane your vote to support.