Thread:DanzxvFan8275/@comment-31247857-20170115100014/@comment-33046846-20170115154329

FranceSwitzerland wrote:

Phillydan25 wrote:

FranceSwitzerland wrote:

Phillydan25 wrote:

FranceSwitzerland wrote:

Phillydan25 wrote:

FranceSwitzerland wrote: @Crimson King, your idea is really good. I also don't think many pages need the Stub Template. I think we have to create the Expand and Inbuilding Template, just like on the Head Soccer Wiki. You overuse the Stub Template. Those List of movies pages should get the Expand Template and the Donald Trump page for example the inbuilding page and all inbuilding movie ideas. Stub pages is only for small pages that must get more content. On the Head Soccer Wiki, the Stub Template is also very less used. Also, apparently adding that template to 5 pages that are stubs is considered overusing. No, but we will overuse that template if you continue adding it to all those pages SS said.

And I want to make something clean. Don't see this as critism, but Phillydan25 why you always only react to something of me? SS made this thread and you have to react to him. He is asking you something, and give my opinion. And you want me to not be rude, but if you keep answering on this way to me, you won't help yourself with it.

Also, where will we use the Cleanup template for? I don't get it. We only need Stub, Expand and Inbuilding. Other templates will become similar and useless. The Cleanup template is used if an article needs to be organized or fixed in grammar. Also, it would also get it if there are broken links or infoboxes that need to be cleaned up. I don't think we need a specific template for this, but if Crimsom Kimg says it's good, then I have nothing to complain. Also, I did also tell SS something. So I did react to it. True, but what must we do with that? On Community Central, they say that a stub pages is less than 300 bytes. I don't care what other wikis do and what you see as a stub. Sorry, really bad answer. SS asked why you think those pages are stubs and what you think there can be improved. You didn't react to that. By your logic, there would only be a few stubs. But ok, fine. I guess I agree. Also don´t say that my idea was a very bad answer.