User blog:DanzxvFan8275/User rights review: TheCrimson King208

Another user and I were concerned about Crimson's activity. While he did say he is semi-active, I feel like a lot of inactivity before affected this. So, I decided to make a user rights review.

Keep in mind that I have nothing against him. He has done good things for the wiki. However, he is, in my opinion, too inactive to be a bureaucrat. Yes, I know he is the founder and he had rights since the beginning. However, the other 3 admins are a lot more active. I just think he is a bit too inactive to be a bureaucrat.

Now, since this is a user rights review, you can not use the usual Support/Neutral/Oppose options. Instead, you have to use the following voting system:

Option A - Crimson keeps all of his powers.

Option B - Crimson loses his bureaucrat powers, but remains an admin.

Option C - Crimson loses his admin and bureaucrat rights, but gets a lower right (Content Moderator, Discussion Moderator, Chat Moderator, or Rollback. If you vote this, make sure to say what right or rights he should be given).

Option D - Crimson loses all of his powers.

Crimson is a great user, but a bit too inactive.