Thread:EeveeBoi87/@comment-27143427-20170824100708/@comment-33046846-20170827125033

EeveeBoi87 wrote: Phillydan25 wrote: That's not really accurate, Crimson. Although the reason for the template was not good (ideas shouldn't be deleted just because they are bad according to some), most of the time users mark spam articles/abandoned ones for deletion. I think it would be better if you specified on that. Thanks for standing up to him. I wasn't standing up to him. I was correcting part of his warning, you still addrd the template for a subpar reason.